For the longest time, utilities have been defined as infrastructure services mostly confined to the primary needs for day to day living such as water, electricity and natural gas for the purpose of providing heating, electricity and usable water. Different countries will have different costs and regulations but generally speaking, those resources represent the service from utility companies.
In most personal financial software, you are provided with the options of categorizing your bills by electricity, natural gas and/or water. Money Sense magazine also makes a distinction between hydro/gas/water and cell phone/internet/TV in their ‘Family Profile’ section where they review a family’s financial situation. Obviously, it makes sense to split them as you could always look at optimizing your telecom spending whereas it is much more difficult to do so for hydro/gas/water without going through some renovations.
The formal definitions aside, the behavior that family exhibits surely shows that telecoms are as much a necessity as hydro or gas. It was not always like that, this behavior is quite recent. I had a look at the revenue generation from the telecoms last summer and it’s clear that wireless catapulted the telecoms to new highs.
Here is a table outlining the annual spending of families as reviewed in the Money Sense ‘Family Profile’ section. You can see that the telecom spending is quite consistent for all families. My spending is shared in the first row to compare. Living on the west coast doesn’t require high heating costs in the winter or expensive cooling in the summer. You’ll find out that the average spending on telecom services is $2,000 while the hydro and heating costs average to $3,339. If you think back to the days when you had a land line and a simple cable tv, the costs were much lower. You can estimate 20$ for phone and 60$ for cable for $1,000 per year if you add some long distance fees to it. Can you see our increased reliance on the telecoms?
Money Sense Issue
|My 2010 Cost||$2,496||$1,944|
I wanted to highlight the fact that telecoms should be seen as utilities from an investment perspective as they too, like utilities, have monthly subscribers sending a healthy amount of money into their coffers for a service. They also provide a service that families cannot live without anymore. As much as we can reduce the cost by eliminating features, we can hardly live without their services without making life style adjustments. How many of you can say your cell phone bill went down over the past year? How many young adults are raised with internet and cell phone as part of their day-to-day life?
From a business perspective, competition is definitely more present with the telecoms but it hasn’t really led to lower prices (at least in Canada). The demand for more bandwidth continues to push for inovation which requires spending in research and infrastructure. The demand is partially driven by us. What they have in common is that they are both regulated to ensure they don’t take advantage of the consumers.
Readers: How does your telecom bill compare to your utilities?